Barra de pesquisa do Blog

segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2011

Maddie McCann : This Documentary was censored and Banned !! WHY? Kate, Why Jerry ??

This documentary was censored in the UK and banned in Portugal,
( http://blip.tv/doc-pj/doc-pj-2113907),  it was based on a book which was also banned in Portugal via an injunction filed by the McCann couple after more than one year had gone by since both documentary and book were, respectively broadcast and published. The McCann couple only filed the above mentioned injunction when negotiations were taking place to publish both book and documentary in the UK. The censorship of both documentary and book envisages their destruction, that is the ultimate McCann couple objective, as stated by their own lawyer. The McCann couple action is a clear attack to a fundamental and inalienable right as stated in Article 37 of the Portuguese Constitution, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and UN's Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Sign the Petition created by Citizens in Defence of Rights and Freedoms - Project Justice Gonçalo Amaral and help us restore Freedom of Speech & Expression in Portugal. International : http://gonaral.epetitions.net Portuguese Citizens & Foreign Citizens residing in Portugal please sign this Petition instead 'Petição Projecto Justiça Gonçalo Amaral' http://www.peticaopublica.com/?pi=PJGA Both Project Justice Gonçalo Amaral petitions will be sent to the European Court of Human Rights, the European Parliament, the Justice Ombudsman; the Portuguese petition will also be sent to the Assembleia da República in Lisbon. More information in different languages here: http://pjga.blogspot.com/


http://blip.tv/doc-pj/doc-pj-2113907

sábado, 28 de maio de 2011

McCanns were broke in 2007



http://mccannfundfraud.info/

Back in the summer of 2007 when the McCanns stayed in Portugal for four months following the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine, the two wealthy doctors were in financial difficulty. Gerry McCann’s sister Patricia recently revealed that family members helped them to pay the mortgage payments on their house in Rothley, Leicestershire.
Quoted in the Daily Record (here), Patricia Cameron said:
“It is so hard to watch Kate and Gerry push themselves constantly. When Madeleine first went missing, family and friends had to step in to help them pay the mortgage.



“Money is constantly tight but they have to keep going. They will never give up looking and that costs money. Families of the missing still need to pay bills while they search but there is no right to any financial help.”

Back at the end of October 2007, it was revealed that the McCanns had used the fund set up to look for their daughter to pay mortgage payments on their home. This, understandably caused an outrage and their spokesman Clarence Mitchell clarified the situation in a BBC article (here). Mitchell said:

“The fund has always had the ability to assist the family financially if necessary. Kate and Gerry McCann stopped using the fund in September when they were made formal suspects in the case.”

Money, or lack of it, is always a motive in a homicide case. Why did the British Government deny the Portuguese police the necessary financial information on Kate Healy and Gerry McCann? Surely in a homicide case this information was crucial to the investigators in trying to establish if there was a motive behind Madeleine’s disappearance. Patrica Cameron has revealed what a lot of people believed at the time – that Madeleine McCann’s parents were in financial difficulty.

Here is the full article as published in the Daily Record on December 23, 2010:

Madeleine McCann’s aunt explains why she has joined charity for missing people.. and how search for little girl goes on.

IN the window of Patricia Cameron’s porch is a photo of her niece Madeleine McCann with the caption, “Still missing, still missed, still looking.”nother Christmas is about to pass, the fourth since Madeleine disappeared in May 2007, leaving only pain and longing behind.
Patricia said: “Christmas is one of the toughest times. But every family occasion is marred because there is a little person who is not there.
“It doesn’t get any easier. If anything, it gets harder.”
This week, Patricia became a family representative for the charity Missing People, who help with searches and support those left behind.
She wanted to take on the role to highlight the plight of the many left with a void in their life – the parents, the children, the sisters, the brothers, the uncles and the aunts of the missing.
The organisation are asking the Government to give families of missing people the same rights as victims of crime, access to legal and financial assistance and emotional support.
It hurts Patricia deeply to watch her little brother Gerry and his wife Kate grow emotionally and physically weaker because of the loss and endless searching for Madeleine.
Patricia said: “Gerry is the baby of the family. I feel very protective and it hurts me to see him looking so tired. They are both just exhausted. They have so much on their plate.
“They are overwhelmed by trying to be breadwinners, investigators and parents. That’s why I support the Missing Rights campaign. People need all the help they can get.”
Madeleine was snatched from the Portuguese holiday resort of Praia da Luz in the Algarve on May 3, 2007, as Gerry and Kate dined nearby.
For the McCanns, there was a desperate need for funds to pay for legal advice and a worldwide search.
Patricia said: “It is so hard to watch Kate and Gerry push themselves constantly. When Madeleine first went missing, family and friends had to step in to help them pay the mortgage.
“Money is constantly tight but they have to keep going. They will never give up looking and that costs money. Families of the missing still need to pay bills while they search but there is no right to any financial help.”
After Madeleine disappeared, Patricia took on the role of babysitter for Kate and Gerry’s twins, Sean and Amelie, now five, while their parents searched.
As a result, there is a close bond between Patricia and the children.
She bathes the twins when she visits the McCanns and chats to them about Madeleine and her memories of her.
Patricia said: “Kate listens sometimes. It is always nice for her to hear someone else’s memories of Madeleine, something more of her little girl.”
There are treasured photos of Madeleine as a toddler, with her aunt holding her in her arms. Patricia was Madeleine’s godmother and there was a special bond between them.
When Patricia and her mum, Eileen, visited her son, Paul, who was studying medicine at Cambridge, she would pick Madeleine up from the nearby McCann family home and take her on a special day out.
Patricia said: “She would say to the twins they were too little to come and so it was just her. That made her feel grown-up. We would have lunch and feed ducks in the park. Not expensive things, just precious memories.
“There were times she had my mum and I in stitches. She was so sharp and funny.”
And Patricia remembers vividly a holiday in Ireland with 46 extended family and friends, and playing rounders on the beach.
Patricia said: “Madeleine was a little daredevil. She was the only one who would go in the water. It was the Atlantic and it was freezing. She was a determined little thing.”
Madeleine’s grandparents suffer terribly. Eileen and Kate’s parents, Susan and Brian Healy, fear they’ll never see her again.
Patricia said: “My mum and Kate’s parents have become very close. They understand each other and what they are going through.
“It is hard for them. They think about Madeleine all the time and have some terrible days. A friend of my mum’s died recently. When she was sick, she told my mum she would send her a sign from heaven to let her know if Madeleine was there.”
Eileen calls the twins her bonny lassie and bonny laddie, and carries one under each arm.
Patricia added: “They are crazy about their granny.”
Christmas cards from the McCanns are still signed with the names of all three children.
And there are still Christmas presents in Madeleine’s room ready for her to come home.
In the meantime, Kate is exhausted juggling family life with writing a book she hopes will help finance the continued search for her daughter.
It is expected to be in shops next April, to coincide with the fourth anniversary of her disappearance.
Patricia is a nurse and the hands-on carer in the family.
Perhaps that’s why it is unusual for her to take on a task like this for Missing People. The lobbying and the campaigning have always been roles for Gerry and Kate.
But they are just too busy. Patricia spent a few days with them last week to give them a break before Christmas.
She said: “Gerry has changed. He is more serious and is always exhausted. It breaks my heart to see him like that.
“Kate has always been thin but they have just had the cold and she looks even thinner now.
“They are both drained emotionally, psychologically and physically.
“They are on a treadmill. They are trying to do their best for their wee daughter who is missing and they are trying to do their best for the wee twins in front of them.
“That’s why organisations like Missing People are vital. I wish at the beginning we had used the kind of support they offer.”
Patricia will never give up hope that Madeleine will be found.
She said: “There are cases of people being hidden and kept for years and those cases give you hope. You have to think like that.
“She could be alive. We just haven’t found her.”
There were over 40,000 incidents of people going missing in Scotland last year.
Missing People have caring, highly skilled staff and volunteers working around the clock all over the UK.
The role of Family Representative is the first of several planned new volunteer opportunities available in Scotland, and involves acting as a spokesperson to the media and local community.

Three years of heartbreak
TIMELINE
May 3, 2007 Madeleine disappears from Praia da Luz, days before her fourth birthday.
May 7, 2007 Police release a description of the kidnapper.
May 10, 2007 Police question Kate and Gerry about why their kids were alone in the apartment.
May 11, 2007 Search of local area called off.
May 12, 2007 Madeleine’s fourth birthday.
May 15, 2007 Local resident Robert Murat is named as an official suspect.
Late May 2007 McCanns enlist help of private investigators.
May 30, 2007 McCanns meet the Pope in Rome.
June 17, 2007 Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa claims vital clues may have been destroyed.
September 7, 2007 Gerry and Kate named as suspects.
September 9, 2007 Gerry and Kate return home.
September 16, 2007 Sir Richard Branson donates £100,000 for McCanns’ legal bill.
October 2, 2007 Policeman in charge of inquiry is removed from case and demoted.
November 1, 2007 Gerry returns to work as surgeon
July 21, 2008 Robert Murat and Kate and Gerry McCann have official suspect status lifted.
July 21, 2008 Portuguese attorney general archives the case. It can be reopened if new evidence comes to light.
May 1, 2009 A projected photo of Madeleine aged six is released.
May 22, 2009 Convicted paedophile Raymond Hewlett denies anything to do with Madeleine’s disappearance.
December 21, 2009 Facebook page claiming to be created by Madeleine’s kidnapper is removed.
January 28, 2010 On 1000th day since disappearance, McCanns host a £150-a-head fundraising dinner.
November 2, 2010 McCanns launch online petition calling for joint review of the case by Portuguese and UK governments.

November 3, 2010 McCanns appeal for cash as Find Madeleine Fund, which once topped £2million, runs dry.



McCann, We may have a new set of clowns but it’s the same old circus.

Back in the summer of 2007, a media conveyor belt churned out a succession of former Scotland Yard detectives offering their expertise on the Madeleine disappearance.

A few days after the media juggernaut started rolling, former Flying Squad commander, John O’Connor appeared—initially it would seem as a supporter of the Portuguese Police—on Sky TV. His words offered some great encouragement to the police in Portugal when we saw him on May 12, 2007. O’Connor began…

“First of all I would like to pay tribute to the Portuguese police. I think they’re doing a good job…”

Five days later, he was interviewed by the Algarve’s expat newspaper the Portuguese Resident on May 17.

… O’Connor spoke of the high quality detective work in Portugal and believes that they will solve this case. He spoke of the competency and professionalism of the Portuguese police, dismissing any accusations they have faced. He outlined that they were initially responding to a missing child and not a crime and, therefore, did not think that their initial response should be criticized.

However, months later when the McCanns became suspects, John O’Connor changed his tune when giving an interview to the CBS Early Show in Los Angeles in mid-September 2007.

“You don’t have a body, you don’t have a cause of death, you don’t have any witnesses, you don’t have a confession, you don’t have a murder weapon and you don’t have a motive…

“I think all they’ve got is some arguable forensic evidence…

“If anybody thinks they can bring a murder charge with all those ingredients missing…

“The first crime scenes were not properly sealed…

“Lack of professional activity by the Portuguese investigators…

“What they have is this arguable evidence which in itself does not mean a thing…”

Former Flying Squad commander John O'Connor couldn't make up his mind whether he supported the Portuguese Police or not. In the end he toed the 'official' line and criticised the PJ with a hypocritical interview with CBS.
Considering that Mr. O’Connor did not know any more about the case than the public, he suddenly seemed to be able to deduce many facts from nothing more than rumour. Why then did O’Connor do a complete u-turn with his attitude towards the Portuguese Police? He did not say that the crime scene was not sealed off properly on May 12 or May 17 when he was so supportive of the Portuguese police. O’Connor had actually visited Praia da Luz in those early days to pound the beat so who or what influenced this man to join in the attacks on the investigators?

Next up we saw former Scotland Yard commander Mike Hames and former police dog handler John Barrett. Regarding Barrett, he appeared purely to discredit the results of Martin Grime’s dogs when they discovered the scent of death and traces of Madeleine’s blood in apartment 5A at the Ocean Club Resort in Praia da Luz. Barrett’s disinformation was amateurish and a blatant piece of spin. Hames described the investigation as a “bit of a shambles“.

In late September 2007, Dai Seaborn Davies—a former Chief Superintendent of the Metropolitan Police—chimed in with his own brand of attacks:
“They remain convinced of her parents’ guilt, apparently unwilling to consider another scenario, even as their “house of cards” case collapses around them. Another fresh revelation that undermines the Portuguese effort is that police also failed to take DNA samples from Madeleine’s little brother Sean, two, and his twin sister, Amelie, until their parents were made “arguidos”, or suspects, just over two weeks ago. This failure has seriously undermined the whole forensic case against the McCanns. It means early forensic work is flawed and needs to be re-examined. A process that could take months.

“Evidence gathered by the Portuguese police against the McCanns which we have learned about in the past couple of weeks depends entirely on forensic tests, including DNA evidence, so-called bodily fluids and hair. Yet I have found that evidence has been fatally flawed through their own incompetence. The apartment was also not sealed off properly, meaning any evidence was contaminated from the outset.

Dai Seaborn Davies shot himself spectacularly in the foot when he stated that the Portuguese Police did not take samples of Sean and Amelie's DNA until a couple of weeks before the McCanns were made arguidos. The PJ had taken samples months before this and we would find the details in the police files released publicly in August 2008.
Dai Davies’ comments were not short, off the cuff comments. These were carefully crafted segments on TV that were designed to bolster Team McCann’s cause while, at the same time, ridiculing the “blundering” Portuguese Police. Always relying on the public’s lack of diligence in checking whether what they said was true or not, Dai Davis was proven wrong when the police file was released in August 2008. The Portuguese Police did take DNA samples from Sean and Amelie months before the date alleged by Davis.

As we have seen, four clowns—Hames, O’Connor, Barrett, Davies—had already made their minds up that the Portuguese Police were inept before they knew the details of the investigation. All were ex-Metropolitan Police.

But the clowns weren’t all from 10 Broadway. Some were from the most famous part of Westminster: Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Miliband and others.

Now we have the incumbent Prime Minister—David Cameron—making a personal request to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, to investigate the Madeleine McCann disappearance at a cost of millions to the British tax payer. The Home Office are describing this move as “ludicrous” in the next stage of the “keep-the-McCanns-out-of-a-trial-at-all-costs” charade.

It is well past the time that this charade must stop.

These games are purposely engineered by the government, MI5/6, and the police, and a new investigation will achieve nothing. The column inches devoted to alleged infighting between these groups is nothing more than a smokescreen. The prospect of a new investigation makes for a great sound-bite in 2011, but Until Kate and Gerry McCann and the rest of the Tapas Seven are forced to answer important questions in front of a jury, we may never find out what happened to poor Madeleine.
The Metropolitan Police have been requested to investigate the Madeleine disappearance at a cost of millions to the British and to the Portuguese taxpayer.

We may have a new set of clowns but it’s the same old circus.




McCann couple altered the crime scene in order to simulate the abduction !!!

Investigation – PJ believes that the McCann couple altered the crime scene in order to simulate the abduction
Maddie’s parents accused of changing the disposition of the furniture and of washing the sofa
Close

The Polícia Judiciária has no doubts that Maddie’s parents changed the disposition of furniture and objects in the apartment where Maddie disappeared from on the evening of May 3, 2007, in the Algarve, thus manipulating the crime scene in order to better justify the abduction theory that they always defended.

According to the Polícia Judiciária’s investigation, which from today onwards is public, the coincidence between the marking of cadaver odour and blood which was given by the sniffer dogs behind the sofa “indubitably” proves that the sofa was pushed against the wall after the little girl’s death. On the other hand, given the few indicia that was collected from this piece of furniture, which was located on the same spot where the dogs gave a signal, the Judiciária admits the possibility that it was “subject to washing” in order to eliminate eventual traces.
Soft toy placed on the bed

“There are strong indicia that they altered the crime scene, moving some of the furniture. The changes are indicators of simulation”, one of the PJ’s reports reads, also revealing that Maddie’s soft toy, which was found at the top of the bed where Maddie slept, was placed there at a posterior moment, given the fact that contrary to the soft toy, the bed failed to reveal cadaver odour.

“There was an intentional modification, in an attempt to take advantage for the simulation of the picture of abduction”, one can read in the process, where the investigators recall that the procedures from the family were in such manner as to conduct the investigation into the direction of the abduction thesis. The Polícia Judiciária believes that the false abduction was “worked by the group”, which made the investigators “waste time”.

McCanns mentioned death to the PJ

The possibility that Madeleine is dead was raised to the PJ by the McCanns themselves, who suggested contacting a person to indicate the spot where the cadaver could be found. “This fact became unexplainable for the elements of the investigation”, the PJ writes, remembering that in front of the journalists, the parents continued to manifest the hope that they would find their daughter alive.

The dogs never failed in 200 searches

In over two hundred searches, ‘Eddie’ and ‘Keela’, the sniffer dogs of the springel spaniel breed that were used in the investigation into the disappearance of Maddie, did not give a single “false positive result”.

The guarantee is given by English expert Martin Grime, who in the report about the search guarantees that the behaviour of the dog that is trained to detect cadaver odour “changed immediately after opening the front door of the apartment” where Madeleine McCann disappeared from.

“He went into the apartment with above average interest”, the document reads, explaining that the dog signaled inside the couple’s bedroom, in the living room, behind the sofa and next to the side window. The same signs were given by the dog that is trained to detect blood residues. The dogs signaled the same spots and objects that are related to the McCanns – house, car and clothes – which was decisive for being made arguidos.
Notes

No credibility

The deposition by Jane Tanner, who said she saw someone crossing the street carrying a child, was not considered credible by the PJ, which does not understand how the McCanns’ friend, upon seeing someone walking away from Madeleine’s apartment “did not act or speak out immediately”.

Everyone lies

The PJ says that the information that was collected from the McCanns and their friends was “worked upon” in order to strengthen the abduction theory. But it rapidly perceived that “everyone lies” in the issue of checking the children, further explaining that the family information, which in these cases is “fundamental”, was always “distorted”.

Files Process is public – From today onwards, the files of the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine can be consulted at the Court of Portimão by lawyers, witnesses and journalists.

Brown Political pressures – Kate’s notebooks reveal that Maddie’s parents called the English prime minister, Gordon Brown, requesting for political pressure to be placed on Portugal.

Book Amaral recounts death – The former coordinator of the Maddie case recounts in his book ‘Truth of the Lie’, his thesis about the case and defends that the little girl was killed in the apartment and her body frozen.

Maddie Mccann... The real story !!!!

SEE ALL STORY IN:

http://goncaloamaraltruthofthelie.blogspot.com/

OHH.... McCANN NOT AGAIN ??

Tormented Kate McCann: I'm tortured by thought that Maddie is being abused by a paedophile

Kate McCann is consumed by the fear that Madeleine was snatched by a paedophile. Four years after her daughter disappeared in Portugal, she has revealed she is tortured by a belief an abuser is responsible.
In an interview, Mrs McCann, 43, describes the guilt she endures on a daily basis over her daughter’s abduction.
Kate McCann, right, has written a book about the disappearance of Madeleine, left, and hopes sales will fund the search for her daughter
Marriage strain: Kate and Gerry McCann. Gerry said: 'There were times when I thought she (Kate) would never get back to being the woman I loved.'
‘I become consumed with it. It was torture for me. It was horrible, so vivid,’ she said.
Madeleine was snatched from her bed in the McCanns’ apartment at a resort in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on the evening of May 3, 2007, days before she turned four.
Her parents were dining with friends at a restaurant, fewer than 100 yards away, and regularly returned to the room to check on their three sleeping children.
But the last time Mrs McCann went to check she found Madeleine had gone.
In her forthcoming book, to be called Madeleine, she writes: ‘When she was first stolen, paedophiles were all we could think about, and it ate away at us.
‘The truly awful manifestation of what I was feeling was a macabre slideshow of vivid pictures in my brain that taunted me relentlessly.
‘I was crying out that I could see Madeleine lying, cold and mottled on a big grey stone slab.
‘The idea of a monster like this touching my daughter, stroking her, defiling her perfect little body, just killed me over and over again.‘I would lie in bed, hating the person who had done this to us – the person who had taken away our little girl and terrified her. I hated him. I wanted to kill him.’Kate and Gerry McCann, pictured outside their house in Leicestershire, try to live as normally as possible for the sake of their children
Lost: Next Thursday marks Madeleine McCann's eight birthday. She went missing a few days before she turned four.
She told the Sun newspaper how her worries intensified when she heard of other abductions involving children nearby. Mrs McCann from Rothley, Leicestershire, also discloses the pressures the ordeal put on her 12-year marriage to husband Gerry.
Immediately after the kidnapping, the couple struggled to cope with their loss and their feelings of guilt. And while she continued on a relentless search for their daughter, he admitted he needed to ‘switch off at times’. Mrs McCann, a part-time GP before Madeleine’s disappearance, said: ‘Gerry and I were just holding each other and saying: ‘We’re not going to survive this.’’
‘I didn’t know if I would ever get back to the person I was. I was conscious about the effect this had on Gerry. He needed me to be together and I just couldn’t get myself there.’
Mr McCann added: ‘There were times when I thought she would never get back to being the woman I loved.
Gone: Gerry McCann's daughter disappeared from her bed in an apartment in Praia da Luz in Portgual, pictured
Abused fear: Madeleine's mother Kate McCann has told how she is consumed by fear that her daughter was snatched by a paedophile
‘I felt our family was being destroyed. It felt like a fight for survival. That’s when I couldn’t see a way out.’
His wife credits the support of a trauma consultant, who joined them in Portugal immediately, for the survival of their marriage.She also said the strength of their two other children, six-year-old twins Amelie and Sean, helped them get through.
Four years after her abduction, Mrs McCann reveals the memory she has of her little girl is frozen in time and she finds it difficult to imagine her as an eight year old.
She has had three dreams of her, all of them describing a phone call she receives informing her that Madeleine has been found.
She said: ‘There she is and I’m cuddling her. The thing is, it’s so tangible. I can feel her, smell her, feel her snuggling into me, like she always did.
‘She’s there, I’m holding her, I’m so happy. And then I wake up. And of course she’s not there. The pain is crippling.’
The couple hope sales of the book will raise £1million to continue funding the worldwide hunt. Mrs McCann said: ‘Every penny we raise through its sales will be spent on our search for Madeleine. Nothing is more important to us than finding our little girl.
‘Madeleine is still missing and there is still a lot to be done. Our efforts to find her are not diminishing. If anything, they are escalating.
‘The need for a review by the authorities of Madeleine’s case remains, and our desire to achieve this unwavering.’ but she complained: ‘We have tried in vain to get the authorities to play their part but our requests have seemingly fallen on deaf ears.
‘It is simply not acceptable that they have, to all intents and purposes, given up on Madeleine. We need the authorities to do more.
‘We are still searching for her. Our small team continues to review all available information, even though we still don’t have access to all of the information that the UK and Portuguese authorities have.’
The McCanns believe that Portuguese police, pictured at the apartment where Maddie went missing, have "given up" on the case
Snatching: This is the apartment from which Madeleline McCann was snatched in Portugal in May 2007
To the McCanns’ intense frustration, the Madeleine police files have been officially abandoned.
Mrs McCann said it was ‘incredible’ that no police force was looking for Madeleine and there had been no formal review of the police evidence, despite this being ‘routine practice in most countries, especially when a key piece of the jigsaw may have been overlooked’.
Mrs McCann wrote the book on the computer in her study over five months and said finishing it was a ‘relief’. She turned down the offer of a ghost writer.
Friends say the McCanns’ ordeal takes a daily toll on their lives, but the couple live as normally as possible for the sake of their children.
She is often seen with the children in the village, taking them to swimming and dancing lessons.
Scene watch: Portuguese police officers on duty near the Ocean Club village where Madeleine disappeared in Praia de Luz. Despite a high-profile investigation she has never been found
The 'naughty man'... What twins call kidnapper Holiday girl: Madeleine McCann in one of the last pictures taken of her
Madeline McCann’s twin siblings will be haunted by the tragedy of their missing sister for the rest of their lives, their mother fears.
Amelie and Sean were just two years old when Maddie was snatched from her bed while they slept only a few feet away.
And while the pair, who are now six and attending school, still talk about their older sister, Kate McCann says they are still too young to fully comprehend the situation.
She said: ‘I am well aware, if God forbid we are still in this situation, that the pain and the anger and the upset will come as they get older and they realise what actually happened.’
Their mother revealed how she and husband Gerry have found it difficult to explain to the twins why they cannot see their sister any more.
She added: ‘We’ve been as honest as we can. They know that Madeleine was stolen. They call the person who took her “the naughty man”.’
Mrs McCann said the children knew their sister had disappeared in Portugal.
‘Amelie said, “We went to Portugal and then we woke up and Madeleine was gone.” ’
the twins’ school in Leicestershire, where Madeleine was due to attend, teachers try to keep their lives as normal as possible.All the children at the school know what happened – which in some respects has made the job harder. According to the McCanns, one new boy once said to Sean: ‘Madeleine is dead, someone shot her.’Sean later told his parents about it – but handled the situation well, they said.
Mr McCann said: ‘He was very matter-of-fact. He said no one knows where Madeleine is.’
His wife added: ‘All the parents have been really supportive and I don’t blame the child at all, they are only young.
‘Children do say things. But I think Sean and Amelie have handled it brilliantly.’
The McCanns said they have drawn strength from the twins, who often comfort them when they are in need.

Dear God, no! The moment she knew Maddie was gone

Artist's impression: Based on witness accounts, an image of the abduction Kate McCann has described for the first time ever the horrifying moment she discovered Madeleine was missing from her bed.
In her heart-rending new book, she tells how she went back to check on Madeleine and her two-year-old twin siblings, Amelie and Sean.
As she entered the apartment, she felt a draft and noticed the door to the children’s bedroom was wide open – but did not immediately realise a stranger had entered.
She said: ‘When I realised Madeleine wasn’t actually there, I went through to our bedroom to see if she’d got into our bed. That would explain the open door.
‘On the discovery of another empty bed, the first wave of panic hit me. As I ran back into the children’s room the closed curtains flew up in a gust of wind.
‘My heart lurched as I saw now, that, behind them, the window was wide open and the shutters on the outside raised all the way up. Nausea, terror, disbelief, fear. Icy fear. Dear God, no! Please, no!’
Madeleine’s bed-sheet still had the corners neatly turned over – and her Cuddle Cat soft toy and pink princess blanket were still lying where she had been sleeping.
Dashing over to the other two beds, Mrs McCann said she found the twins sleeping on obliviously. She then spent 15 seconds frantically searching the cupboards, wardrobe and bathroom of the apartment – but admitted she already feared Madeleine had gone.
Mrs McCann then ran down to the rest of the party shouting, ‘Madeleine’s gone! Someone’s taken her!’ As everyone rushed back and began to search, Mrs McCann ran into the car park yelling her lost daughter’s name. In extracts printed by The Sun, she tells of how windy it was, and says she kept imagining how cold Madeleine would be in her short-sleeved Eeyore pyjamas, and wishing she’d had her warmer Barbie pyjamas on.
Recalling how fear was ‘shearing’ through her body, she said the party raised the alarm with the Ocean Club, where they were staying, at about 10.10pm, and asked them to call the police – who did not arrive immediately.
When Mrs McCann went back into the room to check on the twins, she was surprised to see them still sleeping – which made her suspect that they could have been sedated.

Scotland Yard are now investigate!!!! We will see Kate and Jerry in jail ????





segunda-feira, 23 de maio de 2011

E se Strauss Khan tivesse feito o mesmo em Portugal ???


Se o Strauss Khan tivesse tentado violar uma empregada de hotel portuguesa ( emigrada dos palops ). A empregada dificilmente faria queixa, com medo de represálias, designadamente de ser despedida. Se a empregada fosse destemida, estivesse farta do emprego e fizesse queixa na polícia, o mais provável é que o polícia lhe dissesse para ter juízo e não se meter com trutas e ela desistia da queixa.Se o polícia fosse chanfrado e/ou completamente inexperiente e desse seguimento à queixa, o mais provável é que Strauss Khan já estivesse a meio caminho de Paris quando a polícia chegasse ao aeroporto para o interpelar.

Se, por um bambúrrio de sorte, a polícia o conseguisse prender antes de ele sair do país, o mais provável seria ele ser ouvido por um magistrado que lhe fixava termo de identidade e residência, sendo que ele, na
primeira oportunidade, punha-se a milhas porque tem mais que fazer do que aturar juízes atacados por excessos de zelo.

Se, por alguma razão inexplicável, o velho Khan ficasse em prisão preventiva:

1. No dia seguinte o Público traria um artigo do Dr. Mário Soares verberando a sede de protagonismo de alguns senhores magistrados que não hesitam perante nada para dar nas vistas.

2. Marinho Pinto desdobrar-se-ia perante diversas estações de televisão clamando que os juízes declararam guerra aos políticos e agora já prendem quem nos dá o pãozinho com manteiga, in casu, qualquer coisa
como 78 mil milhões de euros que o maluco do juiz está a pôr em perigo;é pior do que nos tempos da PIDE.

3. O ministro da justiça diria que não compreende como é que um homem acima de qualquer suspeita é preso por um juiz português apenas com base num depoimento de uma pessoa, mas que irá pedir ao Conselho Superior da Magistratura para instaurar um inquérito no sentido de se apurarem esponsabilidades, designadamente disciplinares.

4. Os chefes dos grupos parlamentares do PS e PSD dariam conferências de imprensa em que a nota dominante seria a de que é muito complicado viver num país em que os senhores juízes pensam que são governo e parlamento,não sabendo fazer a distinção que se impõe na óptica da separação dos poderes (o CDS, o BE e o PCP não diriam nada, alegando que há que respeitar o segredo de justiça, mas nas entrelinhas e em "off" deixariam escapar que é incrível o estado de completa roda livre a que a magistratura chegou).

5. As várias Tvs fariam alguns inquéritos de rua em que alguns populares apareceriam dizendo que a "estúpida da preta" (não esquecer que a empregada vítima de tentativa de violação é preta ou negra ou africana ou não caucasiana, ou seja é mesmo preta da Guiné) está mas é a ver se saca "algum" ao Strauss Khan, que toda a gente sabe que é milionário.

6. A presidência do conselho de ministros faria sair uma nota oficiosa indicando que mais uma vez se prova que se a oposição não tivesse irresponsavelmente inviabilizado o PEC IV, a reorganização judiciária já
estaria em marcha, impossibilitando os protagonismos dos senhores juízes demasiado cheios de si próprios.

Azar dos azares: Strauss Khan não tentou violar nenhuma negra em Lisboa

- fê-lo em Nova Iorque.

Por isso ficou em prisão preventiva, tendo a juiz recusado a sua oferta de prestação de caução no valor de 1 milhão de dólares.

Moral da história: em países em que a justiça é mesmo a sério, convém não pisar o risco; nos outros, é o que se quiser, à fartazana.

-Não é senhores Politicos  de Portugal ?????



sexta-feira, 20 de maio de 2011

De quem é a culpa????

A culpa é do pólen dos pinheiros
Dos juízes, padres e mineiros
Dos turistas que vagueiam nas ruas
Das strippers que nunca se põem nuas
Da encefalopatia espongiforme bovina
Do Júlio de Matos do João e da Catarina

A culpa é dos frangos que têm HN1
E dos pobres que já não têm nenhum
A culpa é das prostitutas que não pagam impostos
                                  Que deviam ser pagos também pelos mortos

A culpa é dos reformados e desempregados
Cambada de malandros feios, excomungados
A culpa é dos que têm uma vida sã
E da ociosa Eva que comeu a maçã
A culpa é do Eusébio que já não joga a bola
E daqueles que não batem bem da tola

A culpa é dos putos da casa Pia
Que mentem de noite e de dia
A culpa é dos traidores que emigram
E dos patriotas que ficam e mendigam

A culpa é do Partido Social Democrata
E de todos aqueles que usam gravata
A culpa é do BE do CDS e do PCP
E dos que não querem o TGV

A culpa até pode ser do urso que hiberna
Mas não será nunca de quem governa.





A LÍBIA E A HIPOCRISIA DAS RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS

O que se passa na Líbia e a reacção da “comunidade internacional” (alguém sabe o que isso é?), é a prova acabada da refinada hipocrisia que preside às relações entre as entidades políticas sejam elas quais forem.

E, outrossim, da desorientação que grassa no chamado mundo ocidental, nomeadamente entre os países que fazem parte da NATO e da UE.

Os cerca de milhão e setecentos mil Km2, de pedra e areia, com uma orla marítima mediterrânica de 1770 km, onde se amontoam 90% dos seus 6 milhões de habitantes (cerca de 25% de emigrantes), não apresenta qualquer estrutura que possa permitir constituir um país. A Nação é inexistente e o Estado uma espécie de estado-maior de poder unipessoal, espraiado por uma rede tentacular de nepotismo familiar e étnica. O país é tribal, isto é, constituído por descendentes de 140 tribos árabes e outras berberes, hoje os Tuaregues . Aquilo que os une são as fronteiras coloniais da antiga Tripolitanea e Cirenaica, que a Itália pré fascista conquistou, em 1911, e continuou a administrar a custo, até à independência da Líbia decretada, em 1952, no seio das Nações Unidas. O único cimento comum é a religião muçulmana que, no espaço em questão, não apresenta cisões de vulto.

Kadhafi está no poder há 40 anos, data assinalada com pompa e circunstância em tendas luxuosas visitadas pelos grandes do mundo.

Quando jovem oficial, Kadafi liderou um golpe de estado, em 1969, que se impôs a uma anquilosada monarquia liderada pelo Rei Idris I, antigo líder religioso dos Sanusis, povo que mais se opôs ao domínio italiano. No poder, substituiu os sucessores de Beis e Califas por uma ditadura pessoal de contornos difusos que procurou sustentar com uma doutrina excêntrica saída de uma noite de insónia e colorida a verde.

Os países do mundo e a solidariedade árabe/muçulmana, acomodaram-se à coisa como, de resto, se acomodam a tudo.

O novo grande líder, fogoso como era, de matriz marxista e fundamentalista muçulmano, decidiu apoiar as causas dos “oprimidos” e passou a destilar ódio aos povos do Ocidente cujos governos culpava dos males do mundo.

Não lhe chegando o palco mediático e a acção político – diplomática, o que estaria no seu direito, decidiu apoiar, de motu próprio, a acção de outras organizações empenhadas em acções de terrorismo internacional.

O evento mais espectacular ocorreu com o atentado bombista ao voo 103 da PANAM, que se despenhou na Escócia, em Dezembro de 1988. Morreram 270 pessoas que, porventura, nem sabiam apontar no mapa onde ficava a Líbia.

Fartos de aturar as diatribes de tão original personagem, dois estadistas de rara coragem política – Reagan e Tatcher, decidiram bombardear pelo ar, vários alvos na Líbia, a começar no alvo número um que era o próprio Kadhafi. Corria o ano de 1986.

Morreram umas quantas pessoas, mas não o dito cujo. Nessa altura não pediram autorização a ninguém a não ser para sobrevoo. A Força Aérea Portuguesa mandou descolar aparelhos de alerta, a fim de escoltarem alguns destes voos, quando passavam ao largo da nossa costa. Convém que esta gente saiba que isto aqui não é terra de ninguém…

Votaram-se, então, sanções económicas contra a Líbia que foram em geral cumpridas, sobretudo pelo mundo ocidental (Resolução nº 748 de 31/3/92).

O povo líbio manteve-se pobre e calado e toda esta situação veio reforçar o controle interno do regime, incluindo o reforço em meios militares.

Acontece que a Líbia é o 4º produtor africano de hidrocarbonetos dispondo, porém, das maiores reservas de todo o continente. O desenvolvimento lento da indústria extractiva (iniciada em 1961) e o cada vez maior apetite que os mercados internacionais têm por petróleo e gás natural, não eram compatíveis com a quarentena líbia. Quando Saddam caiu no Iraque, em 2003, Kadhafi desistiu do seu programa de armas de destruição maciça e pagou três biliões de dólares às famílias dos que morreram no voo da Pan Am e de um outro (UTA Flight). O namoro começou, então, de todos os lados. O embargo foi levantado, Kadhafi admitiu a responsabilidade nalgumas vilanias que cometeu e os negócios floresceram. Portugal foi na onda.

As visitas sucediam-se e eram só sorrisos e abraços. O grande líder (e seus rebentos) continuavam a fazer tropelias e a dizer enormidades, mas tudo se lhes passou a admitir.

Na véspera da actual “revolta”, as exportações de petróleo e gás já representavam 10% das necessidades europeias, além de que a UE lhe passou a pagar uma soma considerável para ele não deixar os emigrantes clandestinos passarem do seu território para a margem norte do mare nostrum. Na Líbia desabaram milhares de técnicos, empresas, toda a casta de produtos e … muito armamento. Armamento que agora aqueles que o venderam, querem destruir! Um “filme” continuadamente em reposição, agora em tecnicolor e quase por antecipação desde que criaram a CNN!

Na sequência da revolta popular na Tunísia e Egipto (partindo do principio que não há mais nada por detrás…), elementos de uma das “tribos” estranhas ao clã Kadhafi, revoltaram-se em Bengasi (bem longe de Tripoli!) e revelaram o seu desejo de afastar o concorrente discursivo de Fidel de Castro, para longe dos bunkers onde se refugia.

A partir daqui os eventos precipitaram-se.

Esquecendo-se que a realidade social na Líbia não era idêntica ao Egipto e Tunísia e que ao contrário daqueles países não existia um exército nacional (que por enquanto têm conseguido controlar os acontecimentos), mas sim um corpo mercenário de segurança pessoal, os principais lideres dos países ocidentais puseram-se logo ao lado dos revoltosos excomungando liminarmente o “louco” Kadhafi com quem aliás, almoçavam na véspera. Nisto foram coadjuvados pela esmagadora maioria dos jornalistas que cobriam os eventos.

Alguns lideres que nos habituámos a ver tão moderados, até perante situações mais graves, decretaram urbi et urbi, o fim de Kadhfi e do seu regime, de novo transformado em eixo do mal. A França, à revelia da UE (aliás de tudo e todos), reconheceu diplomaticamente um poder desconhecido, em Bengasi…

O governo de Lisboa foi na onda guardando distâncias.

A Liga Árabe baralhada com tudo o que vai acontecendo de Marrocos ao Iémen, nem sabe o que há-de fazer.

Parecia que as coisas estavam a correr bem para os revoltosos e que aquela espécie de milícias circenses ululantes e de pé descalço, que rumavam a Oeste, rapidamente tomariam Tripoli.

No Conselho de Segurança (CS) pensava-se em sanções e congelamento de contas e bens.

Mas a Kadhafi não faltavam fiéis (a sua tribo à cabeça), armas e dinheiro. E o que lhe faltava em soldados passou a sobrar-lhe em mercenários. Quando conseguiu pôr alguma ordem nas hostes (ou o filho mais mediático, por ele), desatou a malhar nos que se lhes opunham, fechou a fronteira com a Tunísia e começou a empurrar perigosamente a tribo de Bengasi para o deserto egípcio.

Aqui soaram as campainhas de alarme em Washington e nalgumas capitais europeias. Desenhou-se uma zona de interdição aérea, mas russos e chineses opunham-se. Até que, In extremis, na sexta-feira, dia 18/3, com as forças de Kadhafi às portas de Bengasi, o CS aprovou a Resolução nº 1973, que permitia “todas as acções necessárias à protecção de civis”.

De imediato navios e aviões americanos, ingleses e franceses, previamente posicionados, começaram a pulverizar alvos das forças do ditador líbio, com bombas e mísseis.

Mais uma vez os franceses se adiantaram para serem os primeiros e existem fortes dúvidas se efectuaram o primeiro ataque ainda antes da resolução do CS ter entrado em vigor.

Não se percebe o que terá levado russos e chineses a absterem-se na votação, permitindo os ataques e agora, depois destes terem ocorrido, virem pedir que parem…

Aliás a resolução, que contém 95% de palha e 5% de substância, é vaga quanto a esta última. De facto é imprecisa quanto ao âmbito e objectivo; quem pode intervir, durante quanto tempo, etc. Ou seja, permite que qualquer país no mundo vá lá molhar a sopa e se queira posicionar para reclamar eventuais dividendos quando o fumo dissipar.

E, pelos vistos, estabelecer uma zona de exclusão aérea e proteger civis (o que será um civil naquelas circunstâncias?) tem tido um entendimento bastante alargado…

Ao fim de três dias os únicos países que se decidiram a largar armamento sobre as forças de Kadhafi, os EUA, a GB e a França, aparentemente desentenderam-se, não se sabe bem porquê. Como a NATO e a UE não se entendem como intervir e a Liga Árabe começou a virar o bico ao prego, o comando conjunto tem que ser estabelecido com as três potências belicosas para não começarem a disparar cada um para seu lado. A Alemanha pôs-se de fora, sem explicar muito bem porquê. Mais uma vez a França faz o que costuma, que é baralhar tudo e ter espirros de personalidade relativamente a ingleses e americanos. Não se entende muito bem os objectivos da operação: eliminar Kadhafi? Levar os rebeldes ao poder? Parar o fluxo migratório para a Europa? Ganhar contratos após a “crise” ter passado? E o que fará correr Sarkozy? Não deixar que se conheça a extensão do eventual financiamento da sua última campanha eleitoral, por parte do líder líbio? Obter proeminência na UE? Afastar os EUA de África (quintal das traseiras europeu) como os EUA afastam os europeus do continente americano?

Muitas perguntas se levantam, porém: como reagirão os russos e chineses, se o assunto voltar ao CS? Como irá reagir a rua Árabe? E a Liga Árabe? Como reagirão os núcleos de emigrantes muçulmanos na Europa? Porque é que se ataca o governo líbio e não se atacam os governos do Bahrein e do Iémen, por exemplo? Há dois pesos e duas medidas? Porque é que os governos do Irão e de Israel, até agora não emitiram um som?

O que se passa na Líbia é um prenúncio de guerra civil, a mais cruel de todas as guerras. À partida ninguém se deve imiscuir numa guerra civil (a não ser que um interesse vital de uma potência, normalmente um vizinho esteja em perigo). Havendo envolvimento internacionaliza-se o conflito e ninguém sabe onde vai parar!...

Tudo isto parece profundamente errado e aleatório.

Por uma vez, parece que o governo português se resguardou – embora não fique bem votar a resolução do CS e depois pôr-se de fora da sua aplicação. Aliás o governo português não tem dinheiro para mandar cantar um cego e um dia destes terá apenas uma existência virtual. Mas o povo português, além de ter de aprender rapidamente a escolher o sistema político e os políticos para se bem governar, deve relembrar uma máxima que aprenderam ao longo dos séculos e que é esta: nós não podemos confiar verdadeiramente em ninguém, na cena internacional. E devemos contar, sobretudo, com nós próprios.

Imaginem, por um momento, que uma qualquer coligação intentava uma acção semelhante contra Portugal…



MORRO com a PÁTRIA !!!! (SERMÃO de DOMINGO )

SERMÃO de DOMINGO "MORRO com a PÁTRIA"

(Luís de Camões, 10 de Junho de 1580, após o desastre de Alcácer Quibir)

A história parece repetir-se, só que - agora - a morte da Pátria vem-se anunciando já há alguns anos, portanto vem sendo uma morte lenta, consequência - não da perda de uma batalha nas escaldantes areias africanas - mas de um somatório de condenáveis atos e desacatos, de omissões e confusões, de vontades e irresponsabilidades, que a NAÇÃO não impediu por cegueira, comodismo ou "interesse", pois há muito vem sendo avisada por pessoas corajosas e frontais como Medina Carreira e Mário Crespo (por exemplo, não desmerecendo de muitos outros), para não falar dos sérios, claros e graves alertas da Sra. Ferreira Leite, não apenas ao longo de seu mandato como, principalmente, aquando da campanha eleitoral de 2009. Com tal alheamento, o povo português parece querer dar razão a Guerra Junqueiro e Fernando Pessoa, quando a ele se referem, acintosamente.

Os idealizadores da União Europeia não estavam à altura de tão grande tarefa, talvez por ignorarem que - na prática - a teoria é outra, exactamente por serem, na esmagadora maioria políticos que - de política = arte e ciência de governar - tinham conhecimento, apenas, das lutas dentro de seus partidos e pela liderança, onde literalmente "se comem" uns aos outros, faltando-lhes o esforço e a prática da criação de riqueza NO DIA a DIA, o SABER DE EXPERIÊNCIA FEITO da administração de bens materiais e humanos, do ganho do próprio salário e do lucro obtido em actividades produtivas, indispensável para cobrir as despesas próprias, muito diferente de aplicar impostos e viver À CUSTA de quem os paga, quase sempre cidadãos modestos, honestos e trabalhadores vivendo humildemente - se NÃO MISERAVELMENTE - para que seus governantes exibam e esbanjem, desperdicem e gastem à vontade, cegamente, até criminosamente.

Trocaram os governantes portugueses a frota e o direito de pesca por subsídios, ou seja, permitiram a desmobilização de uma milenar actividade produtiva à custa de ESMOLAS, não curando de providenciar a sua substituição por outra, nem sequer de saber ATÉ QUANDO tal troca seria sustentável, incentivando, assim, o DULCE FAR NIENTE, a preguiça, a indolência, que alastrou como praga, o mesmo acontecendo com a pequena agricultura, com a viti-vinicultura (arrancadas as cepas, também com SUBSÍDIO), com a criação de animais domésticos, com a pecuária e com um sem número de milenares actividades QUE DESDE SEMPRE SUSTENTARAM O POVO E ENOBRECERAM A NAÇÃO, tornada dependente e MENDIGANTE com as novas regras, com a cultura da ESMOLA, com o hábito do subsídio, COM A DEPENDÊNCIA DA UNIÃO PARA COMER (80%), PARA TRABALHAR, PARA VIVER (menos) DIGNAMENTE.

Mal governada, mergulhada em "PÂNTANOS", vendo governos e governantes renunciar a meio dos mandatos para se livrarem do peso do fardo que não eram capazes de carregar, mas também para alcançar sinecuras nessa mesma U N I Ã O, também ela SEM GOVERNO ou, pelo menos, com governo ou governos incapazes de prever para PROVER, o que mais que provado está, bastando olhar a gravíssima crise actual, fruto dessa falta de previsão, mas ainda e também, do esbanjar de proventos e riquezas, da criação de estruturas caríssimas, inoperantes e insustentáveis, da falta de planeamento e - acima de tudo - de fiscalização de governos incompetentes, demagógicos, aventureiros, incapazes. A criação de Camões que foi o "VELHO do RESTELO" vem sendo mal vista e pior interpretada, pois "o velho de aspecto venerando" simboliza a prudência e o bom senso, a seriedade e a sabedoria, a experiência e a vivência, ATRIBUTOS MUITO RAROS NOS POLÍTICOS QUE NOS ÚLTIMOS TEMPOS NOS TÊM (DES)GOVERNADO.


MORRENDO COM A PÁTRIA, Camões falecia inocente e de desgosto, ao contrário daqueles que primeiro trataram de A LIQUIDAR para depois espernear recusando-se a com ela ser enterrados, não entendendo que JÁ BASTA o mal que lhe fizeram, já CHEGA o prejuízo que lhe causaram, JÁ É DEMAIS o DANO provocado a PESSOAS e BENS, à MORAL e aos COSTUMES, ao PRESTÍGIO e à TRANQUILIDADE de uma NAÇÃO com quase UM MILÉNIO de história, que é também o mais antigo ESTADO da UNIÃO em sua forma actual, depois de ter sido o GRANDE DESCOBRIDOR de povos e FUNDADOR de NAÇÕES e de ter dado ao MUNDO um Fernão de Magalhães, iniciador da GLOBALIZAÇÃO, autor que foi da primeira VOLTA ao MUNDO, nos tempos em que este ainda vivia na ESCURIDÃO, no ISOLAMENTO e na BARBÁRIE.

Quero agardecer a todos os Politicos, mesmo todos, aqueles  que tornaram este País naquilo que é deste 25 de Abril de 1974.... Obrigado á Democracia do Parlamento Português e aos chulos que lá estão e aqueles que querem para lá ir...